an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
This is pretty unchanged from last year's wishlist actually, but anyway, here we are.

Lucky Duck Shirt (Ladies XL); Evolution Kills Shirt (Ladies 2X); STFU Hoodie (L). Anything else off my ThinkGeek wishlist. Sock Dreams gift cards. Gift cards to places that sell clothing in sizes 14+. A KitchenAid ice cream attachment. Gift cards to places that sell craft supplies. Gift cards to places that sell books. Alcohol (wine, cider, rum, tequila; Zacapa 23 is top of my list for alcohol I would like, it should be available at your local alcohol megastore; Total Wine for certain anyhow). Chocolate. 8g earrings. DS puzzle games. Riedel glassware.

My Amazon wishlist is actually up to date, but I'm not really super invested in any of the stuff that's on it; the books are of more interest to me than the DVDs, though.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
I am no longer involved with KimeraCon, a local Phoenix genre convention, in any official capacity. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the convention, contact information should be available on their web-site.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
I thought about posting this over on [personal profile] ftfisher as it's theoretically my professional journal. Except I guess it's really more my career/vocation journal, which none of this has to do with (rather, it has to do with the field that isn't my career/vocation that I've been working in for the past year and a half).

Anyway, this is long overdue, I know! But here's that article I promised ages ago about happens when you book a hotel room through a third party reservation website (Travelocity, Hotwire, Expedia, Orbitz, etc.) and how to get a good price on a hotel room. And why I laugh my ass off at third party website commercials and have ever since I got a good look at the way most hotels run their rates.

Pricing and selling hotel rates is an art, mostly, and one I'm not particularly versed in (nor do I care to be). But the basic way it works is, the GM or the director of Sales or the Front Desk Manager or the Assistant GM or whoever the hell is charged with these duties at a given hotel (it really, really varies), tries to figure out how best to sell the most rooms for the most overall money in the door and sets their inventory for various specials and deals (ie, how many rooms can be sold under a given special) and negotiates discounted rates. Obviously companies will often negotiate lower rates for their employees and VIP guests, etc. So do conventions that are bringing in a lot of guests, and similarly wedding parties.

And then, of course, third party web-sites negotiate deeper discounts and then, in theory, pass on to guests those discount (at a markup, of course). In reality, you're actually often going to be better off calling the hotel directly if you don't mind a bit of negotiating. And even if you don't want to engage even in low-key negotiating, it can still be worth a call. More on that later. (I do realise calling is not an option for everyone -- many disabilities interfere with phones as a viable option. In that case, a third party site may be your best/cheapest option.)

Anyway, yeah, they negotiate deeper discounts, and hotels set aside a certain number of rooms/room types that can be sold to the third party website(s). This is not to say that those rooms are actually blocked off; the hotel can and will sell those rooms at higher rates should the opportunity arise first. It's just that there's only so many rooms at that discounted rate that they are willing to sell at any given time.

When you reserve through a third party website, it's pre-paid and you give the third party site your money, not the hotel. The third party website then passes the reservation on along with their payment information, not yours. This is why you can't make changes to the reservation directly with the hotel. You're a guest of the hotel but you're not directly doing business with them: you're actually staying there on a third party's dime -- the website that you reserve through.

This is, incidentally, why the hotel will still ask you for a credit card at checkin; it's for incidentals (phone calls, charges in the convenience shop, pet fees, whatever).

So, anyway.

third party websites are pretty much full of shit when they advertise on television about how much cheaper they are than their competitors.

The way pretty much every hotel I've ever seen is set up, they basically have a single discounted third party rate (well, it is usually more complex in the system -- but they give the same discounted rate to all the third party websites that they accept reservations from). It varies how much, but it's usually somewhere between 15% and 25% off BAR (Best Available Rate, which is the marketing lie version of what you probably call rack). It's very, very fucking rare to have deeper discounts. Yes, there's a few, which is how you get the "40% off selected hotels!" in commercials. But, really, just it mostly doesn't happen.

This is why you're better off calling the hotel and seeing what you can get directly through them before you book with a third party website. The rate that you're going to get from the third party website after they tack on their markup is often not any better than what you can get directly through the hotel you're looking at staying with.

So, first, the non-negotiating stuff. Most hotels offered a AAA rate. If you mention AAA on the phone, they will give you that rate without negotiation (and this will work even if it is the height of season for the hotel). And I can assure you, pretty much no one gives enough of a shit to check what the rate is at checkin and go, "Oh HO, this reservation is a AAA rate! Show me your AAA card!". The front desk person just wants to get you checked in as quickly as possible. They also pretty much all also offer an AARP rate. Which again, people don't mostly bother to check ID on.

AAA and AARP are pretty usually 10% off BAR.

Government and military rates usually run 10-15% off BAR. Most people who qualify for either know this but perhaps not everyone does. Yes, I do care if you qualify, because while the front desk person likely doesn't give a shit about checking to make sure you're really government or military (and very likely didn't even notice that you are, depending on their software) because they want to get you in to your room efficiently, I think you're pretty much scum if you ask for a military rate if you're not. Do me a favour and just ask for the damn AAA rate.

And if you don't like that price well enough, this is where some low-key negotiating comes in! Really, I swear, it's not going to be as stressful as you think it is.

Because, a lot of places have either room to negotiate down to a certain rate or at the least, there's something like a manager's special that they can use for companies that don't have specifically negotiated rates, or to lock in a reservation rather than lose it. It will probably be about 15%.

Now, to warn you, depending on who you get on the phone, they're probably not going to be very willing to pull out the lower rates if it's the height of season and they're booked nearly full. They can most likely fill that room at BAR, and why wouldn't they prefer that? But if you have the time/energy/spoons/capablity, it's worth trying! The worst they can do is say no and you're left with the options of the AAA rate or going through the third party website you were looking at.

But the thing is, the hotel will probably be getting more money giving you that discounted rate than they would if you did book through a third party site; after all, they're giving the third party a rate discounted farther than what you paid the third party website. (By the way, that markup is why you don't see the rate on any of the paperwork. It's called a confidential rate and means that it never shows on any of your guest paperwork, because we wouldn't want to let you know how much of a markup the third party website is taking. It's a contractual thing.)

I have no snappy conclusion! There you have the basics of third party website booking and how to get a decent room rate, from a somewhat industry perspective.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask them! I will do my best to answer them.
A woman in high heels on a chimney
"Not to be too personal or disrepectful... is there a reason you wear a skirt?" asks the guest who just had me re-fax a couple of pages for him.

Blink, blink go I. "I... just prefer them," I manage to say, after a moment's stunned silence. I am wearing a basic black velvet sheath skirt that comes down about halfway down my calves. It's not a remarkable skirt in any way.


Seriously? Honestly? That's a question you ask? I just... I don't even. I seriously could not believe this was a question I was fielding.

As it happens, dear reader, and you may already know this: my choice to wear skirts is not religious (it is, also, not that much of a choice but that is a rant for another day). But either way, it's none of your damn business. And yet, if I say "That is personal," or "That's not your business," it comes off defensive, whether or not I actually am defensive. To be honest, I wish I'd managed to say completely neutrally, "I prefer them," with no inflection and no hesitation, because it gives nothing about the nature of that preference.

But, here's a newsflash: if you feel like you have to precede a question with "Not to be too personal or disrespectful," you are almost assuredly being too personal or disrespectful. So, you know, if you don't want to be too personal or disrespectful, DON'T ASK.

People! I swear, sometimes. >:|
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
Would anyone would be interested in hearing about hotel rate pricing structures and why Expedia/Hotels.com/Travelocity/Orbitz commercials talking about the ginormous discounts they get from hotels are pretty hilarious?

Or, for that matter, how such 3rd party online reservations get transmitted to the hotel and handled, and why you can't cancel them with the hotel (or, usually, at all)?

I'm just not sure that this is interesting to anyone who doesn't work in the hotel industry, is why I'm asking first.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
Yeah, I keep forgetting I have this journal. I'd promise to work on that, but, um, I don't see the sense in making promises I've no faith in being able to keep.

A bit of teal deer about how things are going. )

Still working on figuring out an alternative for exercise. I'd love to go hiking with people or something but I haven't the energy to organise anything like that and I'd pretty much have to be the one organising it. It'll be easier when it warms up and I can go swimming at my parents' again, but that only lasts for so many months of the year and then I have to figure something else out again...

So, anyway, unrelated to that, I do want to blog professionally more, I just get super-distracted and never actually finish anything that's a proper article. And I've relatively little inclination to spend my time surfing relevant blogs and web-sites for stuff to talk about like that... anyone got ideas on what I could do that would be relevant and not high effort? I'll keep poking at finishing some articles, but some kind of other content would be nice. Ideas?
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
Today I had an appointment with my broker to go over my Roth IRA account and see what kind of shape it was in and whether we needed to shift anything. I was wearing a fairly nice outfit as I was also going to be dropping resumes off on my home.

As I sat in the lobby of TD Ameritrade, I found myself have one king hell of a moment of imposter syndrome: I am not this person, I can't be, someone is going to notice any minute now that I don't belong here, or the walls will fall away to reveal this is not actual life but in fact television.

It got better once we were actually in my broker's office going over my account but what the hell. Imposter syndrome is a pain in the fucking ass and sometimes utterly inexplicable.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
Lucky Duck Shirt (Ladies XL); Evolution Kills Shirt (Ladies 2X); STFU Hoodie (L). Anything else off my ThinkGeek wishlist. Sock Dreams gift cards. Gift cards to places that sell clothing in sizes 14+. A KitchenAid ice cream attachment. Gift cards to places that sell craft supplies. Alcohol (wine, cider, rum, tequila). Chocolate. 8g earrings. DS puzzle games. Riedel glassware.

My Amazon wishlist, if you come across it, is massively out of date. If I get it updated in a timely fashion (don't hold your breath), I'll update this entry letting you know and linking to it.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
So I am trying to use this thing more. Anybody got any requests for content?

I might try doing more with clothes-blogging at the point where, uh, I can afford some more clothes for better variety and colour choice. Currently all my skirts are BLACK. Which is a fine colour and I am very fond of it but I like COLOUR. And given not a few of my fitted tees are black also... yes. At some point I need to acquire skirts that are not black, and possibly some dresses.

And at some point I might actually do something with my professional journal over at [personal profile] ftfisher. Which has languished utterly unloved for, uh, ages. Any requests for content over there?

(Hmph. My icon selection is tragically lacking. I will have to go and fix that, methinks.)
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
An Open Letter To The Woman In Line At The Wal-Mart:

Apparently you are labouring under the notion that what you have to say is of an relevance or importance to me. So, let me clarify a few things for you:

It is not your business what I am buying. It is not your business how healthy any of it is.

It is incredibly fucking rude to suggest that, instead of the beef bouillon I have in hand to purchase as soon as a register clears, that I should purchase beef marrow bones, freeze them, and make stock from scratch because, "it would be so much cheaper." It is even fucking ruder, when I communicate my opinion of your rudeness with an angry, flat glare and a refusal to engage, to follow that up by saying "It'd be much healthier!"

I sincerely hope you heard me mocking you to my companion. I didn't have the energy to tell you to your face that you were fucking rude but god knows you need to be told.

It's not your fucking business what other people purchase, or why, or how healthy it is. Worry about your own damn business, ma'am, and the world will be a better place.

Sincerely,
The Chick From The Wal-Mart With The Beef Bouillon And The Clothes Hangers

for sale

Sep. 19th, 2010 12:07 pm
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
My house has an electric stove and a microwave that we are looking to sell. Another photo here of it open, with its racks. The stove was only replaced because we wanted a gas stove; it's still a newer stove in very good condition. It comes with a matching over-range microwave. It's $400 for the set.

We also have a table and three matching chairs up for sale for $100 -- it's a very nice round, wooden table. It also has a leaf in it that stores underneath the table; you just pull the table apart and snap it into place.

If you want either you will have to come pick them up; we're in Mesa.

If you're interested you can comment here or email me at ftfisher (at) gmail (dot) com. If not, please feel free to pass the word on to anyone you think might be interested!
A woman in high heels on a chimney
One of my favourite things that I do that is apparently considered remarkable is, I make my own spreadable butter. You know the Land O' Lakes blended stuff? It's like that, only much, much better.

The thing is, I sort of hate margarine. I prefer by far to cook with butter; butter tastes right, margarine doesn't. But I really like the spreadability. And then one day, someone posted a recipe to [community profile] omnomnom and I ran with it because I'd tried the Land O' Lakes stuff and found it somewhat more spreadable than straight butter, but not really enough so to be worth it -- it still need to warm up a bit.

So, here's my personal recipe:

1 lb. butter
1 c. canola oil
.5 c. safflower oil

Let the butter sit out until it's softened up; beat until fluffy. You can do that with a stand mixer or a hand-mixer, either works. I use a stand mixer, because I'm lazy. Once all fluffy, turn your mixer on low and pour in the oil, slowly. Beat it until you get a nice, liquid slurry. Once thoroughly combined, pour into an appropriately sized container (or containers) and stick in the fridge. It will set up into a nice consistency in a hour or so.

The canola oil and the safflower oil are both sufficiently neutral in taste that you really don't get any kind of altered flavour -- it's pure buttery goodness. Only it spreads cold, straight out of the fridge! The safflower's what really does it. But you can use most kinds of oil; the recipe I originally found suggested olive oil and canola. I settled on canola and safflower based on what I know of oils and what I wanted out of it.

The recipe halves down or sizes up pretty damn well too; I actually just made a half batch today.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
So I work at a software company. The software we make, we also support. I am one of the support monkeys.

We, the support monkeys, need to get into the database of our clients on a regular basis and so I have acquired a working knowledge of SQL queries and update statements. This has in turn led to me acquiring a working knowledge of our database's structure. Those of you who know programming probably can see where this is headed, generally.

For the rest of the class, first, you have to understand, the records we create in our software have two attributes. Call them zuzzles and miffle-snargs. Zuzzles can have associated to them a default miffle-snarg so that when you choose your zuzzle, the miffle-snarg is automatically filled in. The miffle-snarg can be changed, as it happens; the default is just, well, the default.

So here's the beautiful thing about our database. The table that contains all the zuzzles is named mifflesnarg. The table that contains the miffles-snargs is named trouslesnargs.

Yes, they really did call the zuzzle database table the *same thing* as an entirely different attribute which in turn is named something else in the database. And yes, the lack of consistency in pluralization I portrayed above is accurate.

You see why it is probably a good thing that I do not have access to a time machine. It would end poorly for our database's architect(s).
A woman in high heels on a chimney
Often, people will say things like "I like this, but I really want to see [their favourite pet feature] first," in the comments discussion of [site community profile] dw_suggestions. Now, [staff profile] denise has already written a lovely entry, detailing why this is irrelevant and unproductive, but I still want to talk about it.

I think a lot of people don't really understand Dreamwidth development -- it's something that happens in the background, and new features come along, and that's all they really get. The regular code tours help in making things more transparent but I don't think the sense of who and what development is has really spread past the volunteer culture.

Here's the thing: it's a volunteer culture. There are, currently, only two paid developers: [staff profile] mark and [staff profile] fu. There are only two people whose job it is to work on this site; their work is, you can be sure, directed.

This site would not be possible without the other developers: the volunteers. Those volunteers decide where to put their time based on the things that matter to them, be it their own use of the site, or the greater good of the site. When you compare the worth of various features and say oh, well, but that isn't really important, you're putting down their decisions and efforts and it's very frustrating.

I'm a contributor to this site -- I have a CLA filed with Dreamwidth, and I have contributed a single partial patch. It wasn't anything big; I colour-shifted the dreamwidth logo for Gradation Vertical. That happened because I asked what was holding up its rollout and was told that they lacked a logo. So I went and made one.

If someone had suggested that their favourite feature was more important than rolling out yet another site scheme when we already had three, it would've really upset me. It would have felt like being told that I had wasted my time, that this thing that I spent some energy and effort on because I cared about it personally was somehow not worth it -- even though it improved the site for me and others.

Dreamwidth development is directed but not linear, and it is not a zero sum game. And talking about it like it is is unproductive -- counter-productive, even.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
I don't believe I've mentioned here that I'm now working in tech support. Between being the only woman who wears skirts (no, seriously, in the entire company -- not just the support side, but in HR and account management as well, as far as I have seen), and the process of learning a truly epic product base, it's been very surreal. Surprisingly fun, but surreal.

Also, I don't know why on earth I thought I'd stop getting problems that baffle wiser techs than I just because I started working professionally as one, but: oh, yeah. That's still happening on a regular basis. It's honestly kind of funny, if facepalm-inducing.

I think it is very telling about the field of IT that though I often say, "But that would be stupid," when talking about any given situation, I am learning to follow that up with, "not that that means they didn't do it. Sigh."

Probably I won't post much in the way of Adventures in Tech Support because wow that's really not a good idea. I might share the occasional anecdote, though.
A woman in high heels on a chimney
Some days I kind of want to get on top of a building with a megaphone and scream from the rooftops:

Food does not have a moral value.

It has, at most, a nutritional value. Vitamins, proteins, etc. Which are not moral choices. Nutrients are what physically keep you going; they are not moral.

You aren't an immoral person for choosing to eat something sweet. Or for choosing the low-fat dressing because you can't stand the salad without something on it. Or for choosing to have the full-fat dressing because the low-fat tastes like ass. Your choices of what foods to eat? Have no bearing on your moral character. Because food does not have a moral value.

And goddamn am I sick of how this permeates our culture. I actually particularly hate being told what a good, moral girl I am for eating... guess what? The food that I actually want to eat. Because fuck you, no. I am not a good girl. I am woman who is listening to what her body is craving and that happens to be something our fucked-up culture has decided is virtuous.

Food? Does not have a moral value.

Y'think if I did shout it from the rooftops it might make a damned difference?
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
I've been working on reducing the amount of light I get exposed to on computers in a bid to limit my chances of migraines. I don't get them very often but they really, really suck.

My best friend uses a Mac, on which I have a profile. I've been tweaking it to make it suck less for me, and Apple is seriously hacking me off with their lack of support for a high-contrast/low-light OS scheme for OSX. If such functionality exists, I have neither been able to find it on my own nor google up anything.

If there's any free or cheap programs out there that let you do this on OSX, lemme know. I did turn up a few programs that give you better control over the brightness/contrast of the monitor. Just nothing relevant to.

In other news, my newest pet peeve -- I think I will love it and pet it and name it George -- is text boxes with the background colour hard-coded when the text colour that goes over it ISN'T. Because let me tell you, white-on-white is just a little frustrating to read.

See, my OS theme, Windows Classic w/ High Contrast Black, dictates white-on-black. Which, bizarrely, is what Firefox uses for text and search boxes over whatever you define as your preferred colours in Firefox itself. Which is its own, related but separate fail that I am not going to really discuss this second.

So, anyhow, if you define a background that is white or very light, I get white-on-white. End result? I get to select the text to check to make sure I haven't fat-fingered whatever I'm typing, or I have to zap the page with my javascript bookmarklet that gives me a black background on green text. And, frankly, I shouldn't have to use that thing for BASIC FUNCTIONALITY.

I mean, really, I'm at peace with the fact that most people can deal with bright screens and that they design with a lot of white. But for fucking fuck's sake, if you're going to define a background colour, then define a goddamned text colour as well.

It's really just good sense. And I'll hate you a lot less.

(And on a hilariously ironic note, it turns out that tropo-purple has a nasty case of this very problem on the entry page. Am now off to report that properly. Thank god for Dreamwidth being so committed to accessibility and usability!)

fuck yeah!

Dec. 15th, 2009 07:58 pm
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
I just did my final presentation in my WST209 class; prior to the class, I was running a B; I got full credit on the presentation so I'm now at an A. Whoo! (I actually resubmitted something, just in case, but it's a bit irrelevant at this point. *g*)

Yay for an A. It should help my GPA a bit. <3.

Now to dig out that Calc III grade. >_>
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
I have been asked to produce a wishlist. Here it is. Please note that if you turn up my Amazon wishlist, it is still out-of-date. I'll try to get it updated in the next few days but don't hold your breath.

Lucky Duck Shirt (Ladies XL); Evolution Kills Shirt (Ladies 2X); Denim Nouvella Basic Footless Tights; Black or Heather Combed Cotton Legging with Stirrups; Bamboo Leggings; STFU Hoodie; Caffeine Molecule travel mug.

Anything else off my ThinkGeek wishlist. Sock Dreams gift cards. Gift cards to places that sell clothing in sizes 14+. A bread machine. A KitchenAid ice cream attachment. Gift cards to places that sell craft supplies. Alcohol. Chocolate. 8g earrings. DS puzzle games. New headphone cords (talk to my husband about which). Good white wine wineglasses.
an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
I can't actually tell how much my hatred of horizontal design online is an actual accessibility issue vs. how much this me being a grumpy, opinionated bitch with some idiosyncratic neurological quirks. But the fact remains that if you put your blog into a horizontal design, I will -- probably not read it. Not even if you've got an RSS feed.

An example of the kind of horizontal design I'm talking about can be found here. I followed a link declaring this to be an awesome blog by an awesome person, and I'm honestly sure that it is. I just can't deal with that design long enough to find out. Genuine accessibility issue or just my idiosyncrasies, it doesn't really matter: I'm out of there, either way. And that is why design still matters.

Technology continues to develop to allow the reader to have greater and greater control their environment and the display of information. But that first impression still matters because while RSS means that I can access your content without dealing with your design, I'm certainly not going to subscribe to your RSS feed until I poke around a bit and see if you really do interest me. And if your design means I don't feel comfortable going to that much trouble then, well, you've lost a reader.

And, frankly, if your design is unwelcoming enough to my aesthetic and quirks, then I'm probably going be ill-disposed towards you, anyway.

So, dear reader, I ask you: what's your philosophy on webdesign? What do you think violates all good sense? What rules do you hold dear?

Mine are pretty simple: don't, for the love of little green apples, bring a print aesthetic onto the computer screen. Keep it simple, stupid. Keep the colour contrast high and the kibble low (kibble includes fonts, colours, pretty pictures and other shiny). Remember what your content is. (In most cases it's text. Do not attempt to deliver text in a graphical, shiny environment because it will just be fucking annoying.)

Profile

an orange tabby cat looking down, to the left, away from the camera
Truelove

December 2011

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Base style:
[personal profile] branchandroot
Theme:
[personal profile] dancing_serpent
Resources:
OpenClipart

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2012 11:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios